NuclearVox
SMR Directory Home
The basic idea

What a PPA actually is

A power purchase agreement is a long term contract to buy electricity at an agreed price, usually signed years before the plant that will generate it is even built. Instead of buying power on the open market day to day, a buyer locks in a deal, often for 15 to 20 years, with a specific project.

Why it matters here

How PPAs finance SMRs

A reactor costs billions and takes years to build, so nobody builds one speculatively. A signed PPA is what gives a project the revenue certainty to secure financing and start construction. In practice, PPAs are the mechanism turning SMR designs into funded, real projects.

Who's buying

Why tech companies are driving this

Data centers and AI have pushed electricity demand higher and faster than utilities can build for. Companies like Meta, Google, Amazon, and Microsoft need firm, round the clock power, and nuclear is one of the few sources that can deliver it. That demand is now flowing directly into SMR offtake deals.

The catch

What a PPA doesn't guarantee

Signing a PPA is a commitment to buy power once it exists, not a guarantee the plant gets built on time or at all. Oklo's deal with Meta, for example, targets first power as early as 2030, well before its reactor design has finished NRC licensing.


The Deal Landscape So Far

What's actually been signed, as of 2026
6.6 GW
Nuclear power Meta alone has committed to procure by 2035
3
SMR developers in this directory with a disclosed corporate offtake deal
20 yr
Typical PPA length. Most of these deals run into the 2040s
2026
The year corporate SMR offtake deals went from rare to routine
Sources: company SEC filings and press releases (Meta, Vistra, NuScale, enCore Energy), TechCrunch, Perkins Coie nuclear industry briefing (2026).

Signed and Pending Deals

A running list of the corporate offtake agreements behind the SMR projects in our directory, and a few of the larger existing-plant deals shaping the market around them.

Meta → Oklo
Signed

Forward power purchase agreement for output from Oklo's Aurora reactor, part of Meta's wider nuclear procurement push.

Capacity
1.2 GW
Target start
As early as 2030
Meta → TerraPower
Signed

Forward offtake agreement for future Natrium output, alongside Meta's Oklo deal, as part of the same January 2026 nuclear procurement announcement.

Capacity
Not disclosed
Target start
Not disclosed
Google → Kairos Power
Signed

Direct PPA for power from Kairos's Hermes reactor fleet, the deal widely seen as the signal that firm PPAs for advanced reactors are becoming a real commercial model.

Capacity
Not disclosed
Target start
Tied to Hermes 2 timeline
Dow Chemical → X-energy
Signed

Industrial offtake agreement anchoring the Xe-100 project at Dow's Seadrift, Texas site. Functionally similar to a PPA, but for on-site industrial power and heat rather than grid delivery.

Capacity
Xe-100 four-pack
Target start
Construction from 2026
TVA → NuScale (via ENTRA1)
In discussion

NuScale's exclusive partner ENTRA1 Energy is in active talks with the Tennessee Valley Authority toward what could become the largest nuclear power deployment program in US history.

Capacity
Not yet finalized
Status
Pre-agreement discussions
Vistra → Meta
Signed

20-year PPA for existing nuclear output, plus a reserved option for power from a future 300 MW SMR at a Vistra site. Not in our SMR directory since it draws on operating plants, but it's shaping the same market.

Capacity
2,609 MW (+ SMR option)
Delivery begins
Late 2026

What This Means If You're Evaluating Nuclear Power

If your organization is exploring a PPA for the first time, the biggest risk isn't the contract itself, it's picking the wrong project or vendor to sign with. That's exactly the gap NuclearVox is built to help close: understanding the landscape, comparing designs, and knowing which projects are actually far enough along to take seriously.